amona posts here

noyka:

billybatsonandjameshowlettsbro:

Who is Zoe Quinn

https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=C5-51PfwI3M

Sums up her, the current BS, and why it’s important perfectly.

False DMCA claims are being used to force youtube silence on the topic. No word on who’s doing it, although standard suspect is the person being laughed at.

What is your most controversial non-political/ideological opinion?

feduptoinfinity:

commanderabutt:

thivus:

whittneydoll:

rikening:

il-dvce:

Could be about anything.

Hot drinks are terrible, not once have I been able to finish a cup of coffee/tea/hot chocolate.

I second that, but only regarding coffee, I cannot drink hot coffee. I get physically ill from it.

pizza isn’t that great

The Incredibles was overated

English dubs can be better than Japanese dubs.

From Gen 3 and on Pokémon has been in a downslide. Gen 5 was the worst I played, didn’t even buy Gen 6.

jakelionstumblr:

A dumb video

Funny-meow cats are pretty cute.

tsubasaneko:

penis-hunger-games:

Twitter has in fact suspended the anonymous account. Even if you’ve been following them, you can no longer see their tweets.
SOOO THEY WERE QUICK TO ACTION WHEN IT ENVOLE’S A MURDERER’S IDENTITY???

what makes this ironic is that TheAnonMessage was spreading misinformation about that.
bryan p williams the person that TheAnonMessage said was the killer is someone who doesn’t have any connection with the ferguson police department. 

tsubasaneko:

penis-hunger-games:

Twitter has in fact suspended the anonymous account. Even if you’ve been following them, you can no longer see their tweets.

SOOO THEY WERE QUICK TO ACTION WHEN IT ENVOLE’S A MURDERER’S IDENTITY???

what makes this ironic is that TheAnonMessage was spreading misinformation about that.

bryan p williams the person that TheAnonMessage said was the killer is someone who doesn’t have any connection with the ferguson police department. 

shakespearelove:

i-m-a-good-viper:

Lesbians:

image

Men:

image

Aaaaaaaand I can’t breathe.

BDSM lesbians don’t real, apparently.

seekingtheunordinary:

deathbeforediet:

canwriteitbetterthanueverfeltit:

stand-up-comic-gifs:

Joan Rivers on the Ed Sullivan Show, 1967 (x)

HOW IN THE WORLD DID SHE TALK LIKE THIS BACK THEN AND END UP HOSTING A SHOW TEARING APART WHAT PEOPLE LOOK FOR A FRIGGING LIVING????

SHOCKED when I got to the bottom and saw “Joan Rivers”

You either die a hero, or you live long enough to see yourself become the villain.

Pretty intense bias though. /: Like, I get that you’re mad about it being unfair, but brushing off PAYING as not a big deal? That could easily be turned around into “a guy needs a nice car, he needs a good job, and he has to be willing to meet her arbitrary financial and class standards and all she has to do is look pretty” but that isn’t fair either.

i totally agree with every single thing you say. and omg, the cancer thing is soo true. the money invested in female cancer (breast, ovaries, cervical, etc...) is WAY more than the money invested in testicular or prostate cancer, for example. little girls are also way more nurtured than little boys. a little boy gets hurt and ppl are like: "meh, put yourself together and be a man" but if a little girl gets hurt the fucking world is supporting her. the worst is that feminists still deny this.
Anonymous

check-your-privilege-feminists:

The cancer thing bothers me a lot just because, while I absolutely am glad that breast cancer and other female cancers are getting a lot of attention, people keep forgetting about male cancers like prostate cancer and such. And then when men started doing No-Shave November and growing Novembeards to raise awareness for prostate cancer, some people (feminists) starting shitting on them too. Like what the heck, this is cancer funding and awareness we’re talking about. Do you not care about that.

It bothers me too, but mainly because breast cancer being so noticed means the charities that collect money can freely skim off the top. Most breast cancer charities aren’t “non-profit” and some events are women-exclusive, meaning men can’t join in and help fundraise. Not to mention men can get breast cancer, and because the campaigns only talk about women the men don’t get checked until it’s much more advanced.

muffystopheles:

coyotelips:

hiddlesfiddleswithme:

Little girl being pepper sprayed in #ferguson #stopdontshoot #justiceformikebrown

ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME

PLEASE RESEARCH THINGS LIKE THIS. THIS IS FROM 2011, IN BRAZIL. NOT FERGUSON. SPREADING MISINFORMATION DOES NOT HELP THE CAUSE. I’LL REPEAT: SPREADING MISINFORMATION DOES NOT HELP THE CAUSE. 

muffystopheles:

coyotelips:

hiddlesfiddleswithme:

Little girl being pepper sprayed in #ferguson #stopdontshoot #justiceformikebrown

ARE YOU FUCKING KIDDING ME

PLEASE RESEARCH THINGS LIKE THIS. THIS IS FROM 2011, IN BRAZIL. NOT FERGUSON. SPREADING MISINFORMATION DOES NOT HELP THE CAUSE. I’LL REPEAT: SPREADING MISINFORMATION DOES NOT HELP THE CAUSE. 

Yes, but it doesn't actually do that. I'm circimcised and I masturbate daily. Women subject to FGM have the entire clitoris removed, or their vagina sewed shut. The only male circumcision could compare would be if we hacked off the entire glans.
Anonymous

poppypicklesticks:

Some FGM only removes part of the clit or parts of the labia.

Should we support them or condone them?

From what I remember, some of the practitioners of female circumcision tried to get a compromise where they could prick the genital skin to draw blood. It would have kept their custom intact, but made it physically harmless.

That was forbidden as well and was classed as FGM.

Anon, what you’re describing does happen, but it’s not the only kind of FGM. The WHO classifies several types: Type I is the removal of the clitoral hood; Type II is the removal of the clitoral hood, clitoris head, the inner labia, and sometimes some outer labia; and Type III, also known as infibulation, is the most brutal and, as one adult woman practitioner proudly described, can go as far to scrape all of apparent vulva-related flesh away, leaving only a small hole that must be reopened with a scalpel or a knife for anything but urination and menstruation. Type IV seems to be a miscellaneous category, including some mild types like stretching the labia or nicking for a drop of blood but also including some brutal types like “widening” the vaginal cavity with a knife or burning the labia.

Type III accounts for at maximum 10% of all FGM and takes place in a few relatively isolated areas.

There are a number of reasons why people perform FGM, with reduction of female pleasure being only one of many. The idea that it heightens male sexual pleasure very well may be just like nearly every other folk-remedy aphrodisiac or could be a way to claim that their group’s women and culture were superior (so don’t stray and get a wife from elsewhere). In some areas, women who weren’t circumcized are looked at by other women with disgust and mockery. Many researchers have gone in with theories that taint their conclusions, such as one that assumed the husbands enjoyed causing pain to their wives.

Anon, in the female, the clitoris is the most highly sensitive part of the genitals. In the male, it is the foreskin. The clitoris is much more than the head and extends into the body. This means your statement isn’t as good of a comparison as you think it is. Considering that without a foreskin the glans dries and keratinizes, reducing sensation greatly, it may already be comparable to the amount of sensation lost from removing the clitoris.

The reason people bring up male circumcision being intended to reduce pleasure is because of the people who claim male circumcision isn’t comparable to FGM because that’s meant to control sexuality but circumcision isn’t. Both were intended to reduce it. Does it work on all men? No, but some circumcized women also manage to masturbate and find pleasure in sex as well. That shouldn’t invalidate that they went through.

Either way, cutting the flesh of an infant is unnecessary and cruel. Male infants can go into shock, have seizures, have their brains rewire to match PTSD patterns, have significant behavioral changes, have needed to have their genitals removed due to post-surgical infection, or have even bled out; we don’t bother testing similar criteria for females because it’s already banned here. Many of the supposed benefits would really only matter to those who are sexually active, and even those criteria are contested. Really though, the only thing we should need to know to ban it is it takes an infant and exposes it to pain and misery for no logical reason.